Multi-compare
Compare cloud DR tools side by side
Short answer
Pick two to five tools to see every score and reason, the incidents each documents, published recovery targets, clouds and prices in one table. The default view shows the three highest-scoring tools. The selection is kept in the page address, so you can share it.
Which tools do you want to compare?
How do the selected tools compare?
| Row | Arpio | Firefly | Commvault Cloud Rewind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | |||
| Rank | 1 of 5 | 2 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Rebuild scope 20% | 7.2Replicates infrastructure and data with dependency mapping on AWS and Azure; a list of covered resource types is not published. | 8.6highest in this selectionThe coverage table lists 190 AWS and 86 Azure resource types, including IAM, Route 53, VPC, security groups, EKS and AKS; Google Cloud is not in the table. | 8.4Captures compute, storage, networking, databases and security on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud; the G2 description adds Kubernetes clusters, security groups and load balancers. |
| Recovery orchestration 15% | 9.0highest in this selectionOrchestrated failover in every tier, automated failback in Premium and orchestrated ransomware recovery in Enterprise. | 8.4Scheduled and on-demand policies capture dependencies automatically; the restore is a guided Terraform flow rather than a single failover step. | 8.8Automated point-in-time capture and recovery of multi-layer application stacks is the core of the product. |
| Region and account loss 15% | 9.0highest in this selectionCross-account and cross-region failover on AWS and cross-subscription orchestration on Azure. | 8.2Documents cross-region and cross-account rebuild, including into a clean, isolated region or account. | 8.2Docs describe recovery to the original or a different VPC, region, zone or account; cross-account recovery is currently AWS only. |
| Bad-change rollback 15% | 3.5Drift detection, a configuration change history and rollback of a bad change are not published. | 9.2highest in this selectionChange history, mutation tracking, drift detection and point-in-time rollback from versioned snapshots are core features. | 6.0Point-in-time copies give a rollback point; drift analysis appears only in a third-party analyst quote on Commvault's page, and drift remediation is not described. |
| Published recovery targets 10% | 7.0highest in this selectionPublishes RPO targets by tier (as low as 15 minutes, real-time in Premium); no RTO figure is published. | 7.0highest in this selectionStates an RTO under 1 hour; no RPO figure is published. | 2.0No RTO or RPO figure on the product page. |
| Recovery testing 10% | 9.0highest in this selectionFailover tests that do not disrupt production, plus network sandbox testing in Premium. | 4.0Its disaster recovery page says resilience posture management validates backups, replication, dependencies and failover paths, but a recovery test or drill workflow is not described in the docs. | 7.0The AWS Marketplace listing says recovery can be tested against live production; a step-by-step test workflow is not published. |
| Data inside the rebuild 10% | 7.8Continuous replication of data with RPO targets stated per tier. | 3.0States that data backup is not service continuity and does not document backing up database or volume contents. | 8.0highest in this selectionIn-sync copies include workload data, from Commvault, which has sold backup since its founding in 1996. |
| Pricing transparency 5% | 9.0highest in this selectionEvery tier is priced on the pricing page, from $12k single-cloud, billed annually. | 5.5Essential is published at $2,499 a month billed annually but does not include Backup and DR, which is Enterprise only at custom pricing. | 6.5AWS Marketplace lists per-instance prices ($0.035 per instance per hour on demand, or $291 per instance for a 12-month contract); Commvault's own page shows no figures. |
| Incidents | 2 of 3 documented | 3 of 3 documented | 2 of 3 documented |
| RTO | Not published | Vendor states: Under 1 hour | Not published |
| RPO | Vendor states: As low as 15 minutes (Standard); real-time (Premium) | Not published | Not published |
| AWS | Documented | Documented | Documented |
| Azure | Documented | Documented | Documented |
| Google Cloud | Not documented on the pages reviewed | Documented with a caveat | Documented |
| Pricing | Billed annually. Standard: $12k single-cloud or $18k multi-cloud, 25 core resources. Premium: $36k single-cloud or $54k multi-cloud, 50 core resources, up to a maximum of 250. Enterprise: custom quote, 100+ core resources. No charge on storage size; cloud provider costs apply. | 14-day free trial with all features, no credit card. Essential: $2,499 a month billed annually, up to 20,000 assets; it does not include Backup and DR. Enterprise, which adds Infrastructure Backup and DR, configuration history, automated backup policies and Instant Recovery with an RTO under 1 hour: custom pricing. Listed on the AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and Datadog marketplaces. | AWS Marketplace: $0.035 per instance per hour on demand (falling to $0.021 above 100,000 instances), or $291 per instance for a 12-month contract with $0.035 per unit overage; 24- and 36-month contracts are listed. Commvault's own page says pricing is based on actual usage and shows no figures. |
| Restore as code | Arpio does not publish infrastructure-as-code output from a recovery. | Restores are generated as Terraform code rather than applied as direct changes to the cloud. | The AWS Marketplace listing says point-in-time restores use native AWS CloudFormation; Commvault markets the product as a way to skip complex IaC, and a Terraform export is not published. |
| Profile | Arpio profile | Firefly profile | Commvault Cloud Rewind profile |
Pairing pages
Frequently asked questions
Are these scores measured?
No. They are editorial scores from public vendor pages read in September and October 2026 and updated on 13 October 2026, with a one-line reason each. Recovery figures are the vendors' claims.
Why compare a recoverability tool with recovery tools?
Buyers often shortlist them together. Gambit Security validates recoverability across backups, IaC and cloud; it does not recover your cloud itself. The table makes that difference visible criterion by criterion.
Can I share a comparison?
Yes. The selection is in the page address, so copying the URL shares the same view.